TIME Supreme Court

Clarence Thomas Just Asked His First Question in a Supreme Court Argument in 3 Years

Associate Justice Clarence Thomas sits with fellow Supreme Court justices for a group portrait at the Supreme Court Building
J. Scott Applewhite—AP Associate Justice Clarence Thomas sits with fellow Supreme Court justices for a group portrait at the Supreme Court Building in Washington on Nov. 30, 2018. Thomas spoke at a U.S. Supreme Court argument for the first time in three years on March 20, 2019.

Thomas’s questions came in the final minutes of a one-hour argument

Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a U.S. Supreme Court argument for the first time in three years, questioning a defense lawyer seeking to overturn her client’s death sentence because the prosecutor repeatedly excluded black people from the jury.

Thomas’s questions came in the final minutes of a one-hour argument Wednesday over Curtis Flowers, a Mississippi murder defendant. Thomas asked Flowers’s lawyer, Sheri Lynn Johnson, whether the attorney who defended him at trial eliminated any prospective jurors.

When Johnson said yes, Thomas followed up: “And what was the race of the jurors struck there?”

Johnson said the defense lawyer excluded only white jurors.

“But I would add that her motivation is not the question here,” she said. “The question is the motivation of Doug Evans,” the prosecutor.

Thomas’s questions came after his colleagues indicated they were inclined to throw out Flowers’s conviction for killing four people.

Flowers has been tried six times for the same offense. Three of those trials ended in convictions that were thrown out on appeal, once because the prosecutor excluded blacks from the jury. Two other prosecutions ended with mistrials.

The jury that convicted Flowers in the sixth trial included 11 white people and one black person. Evans, the district attorney, struck five black prospective jurors.

[video id=HO61fNmK]

Thomas, 70, a member of the court since 1991, has said he thinks his colleagues ask too many questions during court sessions. He once went 10 years without speaking up at an argument. The court’s only black justice, he intervenes most commonly during cases involving race, including a 2003 argument over university affirmative action and a 2002 clash about cross burning.

His last questions came on Feb. 29, 2016, when he asked almost a dozen questions in a case over a federal law that bars firearm possession by people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence.

Tap to read full story

Your browser is out of date. Please update your browser at http://update.microsoft.com


YOU BROKE TIME.COM!

Dear TIME Reader,

As a regular visitor to TIME.com, we are sure you enjoy all the great journalism created by our editors and reporters. Great journalism has great value, and it costs money to make it. One of the main ways we cover our costs is through advertising.

The use of software that blocks ads limits our ability to provide you with the journalism you enjoy. Consider turning your Ad Blocker off so that we can continue to provide the world class journalism you have become accustomed to.

The TIME Team