TIME Panama Papers

David Cameron Once Argued That Trusts Should Not Be Treated Like Companies

David Cameron Conducts Q&A With Workers On the European Referendum
Christopher Furlong—Getty Images Prime Minister David Cameron, pictured leaving a Q&A session on on the forthcoming European Union referendum in Birmingham on April 5, 2016

In a letter to the European Council president in 2013, he said that the solutions for addressing the misuse of companies "may well not be appropriate generally"

As the U.K.’s Prime Minister David Cameron faces questions over an offshore trust set up by his late father, it has emerged that he once argued against applying transparency standards for companies to trusts.

Newspapers in Britain have unearthed a 2013 letter to then European Council President Herman van Rompuy, in which Cameron argued that trusts should, at least for the time being, be treated differently from companies in new European rules designed to increase transparency and crack down on money laundering and tax evasion.

The revelation comes after the Conservative party leader’s office said that neither he nor his family stand to benefit in the future from Blairmore Holdings Inc., an offshore trust set up by Ian Cameron in the 1980s. Details of the trust, which employed people in the Bahamas to act as directors and reportedly never paid tax in the U.K., were revealed in a massive leak of confidential papers from the Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca — the so-called Panama Papers — that has produced a number of explosive revelations since journalists began publishing details on Sunday.

While signalling a willingness to look “properly at the arguments around trusts” and, declaring that the E.U. should continue to support tax information exchange agreements as a means of preventing their misuse, Cameron, in his letter to van Rompuy, added: “It is clearly important we recognize the important differences between companies and trusts. This means that the solution for addressing the potential misuse of companies – such as central public registries – may well not be appropriate generally.”

According to the Financial Times, Britain successfully argued that trusts were sometimes used to protect the privacy of vulnerable people like children, and that some beneficiaries might not even be aware that they stood to gain from a trust in the future. However, a U.K. government official told the FT that in the final directive adopted in 2015 “trusts which generate tax consequences” had to disclose their ownership to U.K. taxation authorities.

[FT, Guardian]

Tap to read full story

Your browser is out of date. Please update your browser at http://update.microsoft.com


YOU BROKE TIME.COM!

Dear TIME Reader,

As a regular visitor to TIME.com, we are sure you enjoy all the great journalism created by our editors and reporters. Great journalism has great value, and it costs money to make it. One of the main ways we cover our costs is through advertising.

The use of software that blocks ads limits our ability to provide you with the journalism you enjoy. Consider turning your Ad Blocker off so that we can continue to provide the world class journalism you have become accustomed to.

The TIME Team